Wet Lab: Current Treatment Options for Stress Urinary Incontinence and Wet Lab

Reference 1: 1) Noblett KL, Shen B, Lane FL. Lynx® midurethral sling system: a 1-year prospective study on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1217-21.
2) Urology Care Foundation. What is stress urinary incontinence (SUI)? https://www.urologyhealth.org/urologic-conditions/stress-urinary-incontinence-(sui). Accessed October 19, 2018.
3) Visser E, de Bock GH, Kollen BJ, et al. Systematic screening for urinary incontinence in older women: Who could benefit from it? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012 Mar;30(1):21-8.
4. Kobashi KC, et al.Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2017 Oct;198(4):875-883. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.061. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
5. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2066-76.
6. Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obset Gynecol 2008; 111:611-21
7. Sivaslioglu AA, Unlubilgin E, Aydogmus S, et al. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Transobturator Tape and Tissue Fixation Mini-Sling in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence: 5-Year Results. J Urol 2021: 188 (1): 194-199
8. White AB, Kahn BS, Gonzalez RR, Rosamilia A, et al. Prospective study of a single-incision sling versus a transobturator sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 3-year results. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology: 2020: 223(4) 545.e1-545.e11.
9. Ruffolo AF, Bonavina G, Serati M, et al. Single-incision mini-sling and trans-obturator sling for stress urinary incontinence: A 5-year comparison. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: 2022: 270, 90-94.
10. Kirchin V, Page T et al., Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017
11. Chapple C, Dmochowski R. Particulate Versus Non-Particulate Bulking Agents In The Treatment Of Stress Urinary Incontinence. Reports in Urology 2019:11 299-310
12. Christensen et al. Tissue integration of polyacrylamide hydrogel: an experimental study of periurethral, perivesical, and mammary gland tissue in the pig. Dermatol Surg 34 (2008) (Suppl 1) : S68–S77
13. Brosche et al. Seven‐year efficacy and safety outcomes of Bulkamid for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. Vol 40(1):502-508, 2021
14. Freitas AM et al. Tension free vaginal tape vs polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. Vol 203, 372 – 378, 2020
15. Freitas et al. Tension-Free Vaginal Tape and Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Injection for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence: 3-Year Follow-up from a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol 2022: 208: 658-667
16. Giammo A, Ammirati E, Geretto P et al. Can urethral re-bulking improve the outcomes of a prior urethral bulking? Ther Adv Urol 2022, Vol. 14: 1–5
17. Freitas AM et al. Quality of life and sexual function after TVT surgery versus Bulkamid injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: 1 year results from a randomized clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J 2021: 32, 595–601



Reference 2: 0
Reference 3: 0